Modern Tire Dealer

MAR 2019

Magazine for the professional tire industry

Issue link: https://mtd.epubxp.com/i/1093609

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 21 of 77

M T D M a r c h 2 0 1 9 20 W i n t e r T i r e s T rue or false: A tire with the 3-Peak Mountain Snowflake symbol stamped on the sidewall is always a winter tire. e answer is false: A winter tire must be branded with the symbol, but that alone doesn't make it a winter tire. True or false: The 3-Peak Mountain Snowflake symbol is a better indication of winter performance than the M+S des- ignation. e answer is true: e 3-Peak Mountain Snowflake symbol is a performance standard, while the M&S designation is a visual standard. To better understand these answers is the first step in defining a winter tire. MUD + SNOW The M&S designation developed in the 1970s as a way of distinguishing tires with aggressive tread patterns from bias-ply tires with the more traditional ribbed patterns, according to Woody Rogers, tire information specialist at e Tire Rack Inc. "At the time, aggressive tread is where they achieved better… traction," he said. "Of course, they changed the compounding a little bit, too. "But M+S isn't a performance standard. It is merely a visual standard. e tread pattern has to have at least 25% open space from a two-dimensional standpoint. And it has to have a ½-inch notch in one shoulder… every so oen. "at's it. You could take a 1965 bias rib tire, open it up just a little bit, put a notch in one shoulder, and that is an M+S tire. It has nothing to do with how much traction it actually has in the mud or on snow." Here is the Tire Information Service Bulletin (Vol. 10, No. 7) that defines snow tire definitions for passenger and light truck tires, courtesy of the U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association (USTMA): Passenger and light truck tires meeting the following criteria are marked on at least one sidewall with the letters "M" and "S" (e.g., MS, M/S, M&S, M+S, etc.). ese tires have been designed to provide better starting, stopping, and driving performance in snow conditions than non-M&S tires, and have the following general characteristics: 1. e new tire tread shall have multiple pockets or slots in at least one tread edge that meet the following require- ments based on mold dimensions: a. Extend toward the tread center at least 1/2 inch from the footprint edge, measured perpendicularly to the tread centerline. b. A mimimum cross-sectional width of 1/16 inch. c. Edges of pockets or slots at angles between 35 and 90 degrees from the direction of travel. 2. e new tire tread contact surface void area will be a minimum of 25% based on mold dimensions. (USTMA) In 1999 USTMA (formerly the Rubber Manufacturers Association) and Rubber Association of Canada (RAC) jointly defined tires for use in severe snow conditions. 3-PEAK MOUNTAIN SNOWFLAKE e mountain snowflake symbol doesn't replace the M+S designation, it just adds to it. Here is the Tire Information Service Bulletin (Vol 37, No. 5) that defines passenger and light truck tires for use in severe snow conditions: • Tires designed for use in severe snow conditions generally have tread patterns, structure, and materials to give superior performance in snow over tires meeting the USTMA Snow Tire Definition. • Tires designed for use in severe snow conditions are recognized by manu- facturers to attain a traction index equal to or greater than 110 (Snow Grip Index of 1.10) compared to the ASTM E1136 Standard Reference Test Tire when using ASTM F1805-06 snow traction test with medium packed snow surface and equivalent percentage loads. Other test methods and reference tires developed by standardizing bodies may be used provided proper correlations are demonstrated. • Tires designed for use in severe snow conditions that meet the performance criteria above qualify for marking on at Bob Ulrich By The evolution of winter tires EVEN THE 3-PEAK MOUNTAIN SNOWFLAKE ISN'T ENOUGH ANYMORE CANADIAN PASSENGER TIRE UNITS SHIPPED 2004-2018 (in millions) Year Overall Winter %winter 2018 20.0 8.0 40.0% 2017 18.4 7.2 39.1% 2016 18.4 6.6 35.8% 2015 18.8 7.2 38.3% 2014 18.0 7.0 38.9% 2013 15.8 4.6 29.1% 2012 15.6 4.8 30.7% 2011 16.0 4.9 30.6% 2010 16.5 5.3 32.1% 2009 20.0 7.5 37.5% 2008 19.0 7.0 36.8% 2007 17.4 5.5 31.6% 2006 16.4 5.3 32.3% 2005 17.6 6.0 34.1% 2004 16.7 5.3 31.7% SOURCES: TIRE AND RUBBER ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, MODERN TIRE DEALER

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Modern Tire Dealer - MAR 2019